pink fish media

Go Back   pink fish media > discussion > photo

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 14-04-17, 11:34 PM
Soloist Soloist is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 305
Macro Lens - Advice Please

Morning Forum.

I have an itch to scratch in the form of a new lens. I have decided that what I've really wanted over the years is a macro lens but I've never used one so I've no idea what length to go for!

I like taking details of natural features for abstract textures
The camera is FX
Budget is 'enough to get the job done properly'

So the question is 85? longer?

Any experiences out there? Is this one of those bits of kit you buy, use once and then have in the bag as an 'oh yes, I've got one of those'?

Please share your honest opinions!

Thanks. Andrew

Last edited by Soloist; 15-04-17 at 12:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-04-17, 11:51 PM
Lefty Lefty is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,634
Hi Andrew,

What is the camera? I've recently picked up a Tokina 100/2.8 Macro for my Nikon D800E and am very happy with the results. I previously had a Sigma 105/2.8 for my D610 and was equally happy with that. The Sigma had the added benefit of VR, but the Tokina is a tad better optically. Both of these weigh in at around 300 - 350 new, although can be picked up for around 100 less second hand. The other lens which is well regarded is the Tamron 90mm, but I've not used that so can't comment.

In terms of focal length, you don't want to go too wide, as that will mean you'll have to get close to your subject and risk casting a shadow or disturbing them.

Hope this helps.

Lefty
__________________
www.amarsoodphoto.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-04-17, 12:02 AM
Soloist Soloist is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 305
Camera is a D700. Your comments support my instinct to 'go longer'. Good to know there may be some bargain s/h lenses to have too! I'd not considered Tokina as I put it below Sigma for quality. Again, good to know.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-04-17, 03:54 AM
Lefty Lefty is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,634
My pleasure Andrew - I don't think you can go too far wrong with either the Sigma 105/2.8, Tokina 100/2.8, Nikon 105/2.8 it or Tamron 90/2.8.

I love macro too

Lefty
__________________
www.amarsoodphoto.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-04-17, 12:42 AM
Vinyl Giraffe Vinyl Giraffe is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 54
I've got the Nikon 105 vr macro, and think it is an excellent lens. Color rendition and sharpness are great. Focal length gives decent working distance in the macro range. A little big and heavy for the fixed focal length, but I've got no complaints otherwise. VR is limited in use for macro, but you'll likely want to be shooting in brighter light/with flash and a tripod anyway, due to the limited depth of field, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-04-17, 12:58 AM
Blurboy Blurboy is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 504
Get the Sigma. It's sharper than the Nikon VR and trounces the Tokina. I use Nikon gear, all Pro series lenses and chose the Sigma purely for optical reasons over the Nikon. Check any online review too. You'd only buy the Nikon for snob badge value.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17-04-17, 02:37 AM
Soloist Soloist is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 305
Cool. And typical - just missed out on one on eBay that went sub-130!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-04-17, 04:17 AM
Blurboy Blurboy is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 504
Make sure you get the right Sigma. You need the OS EX DG HSM model and not the non OS ones.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-04-17, 04:09 PM
James James is offline
Lord of the Erg\o/s
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 14,046
I've had macros in two lengths; 35mm and 100mm. I regret selling the 100 macro, but the 35mm has better versatility if I carried only one lens. Both offer 1:1 magnification, but the 100mm is much harder to hand-hold at full magnification.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-04-17, 03:41 AM
Soloist Soloist is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 305
Hmm, many thanks... Still listening; still looking!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21-04-17, 01:12 PM
Colinb Colinb is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 574
A few pictures taken with the Tokina:




Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 22-04-17, 03:36 AM
Rockmeister Rockmeister is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,051
I've had use of Nikon Sigma and Tamron macro lenses. You already have the best advice regarding focal length, which is that live subjects are FAR easier with longer focal lengths. My Nikon Micro 60 for example, forces me to actually touch a subject with the rim of the lens hood for proper 1 to 1 macro shots, which is not ideal! D700 is great for Macro but you want at least a 90mm, and preferably more.
My own experience suggests that the very very sharpest shots require a Tripod (making VR redundant mostly) and maybe even photostacking for the really spectacular. If your more casual thatn this, then make sure that your chosen lens works at it's sharpest at a sensible aperture..looking for pretty bokeh wide open at f1.8 is useless in Macro...you end up with only 1/10th of a millimeter depth of field, so even the slightest movement results in a blur. Check the lens performance at f8 or f11. That at least gives you SOME DOF and if you move out a tad from full magnification at those apertures and then crop the image you should be getting something spectacular.
For quality, ANY of the mentioned lenses will be just fine, although my time with the very latest Tamron SP90 suggests that that is where MY money would go.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22-04-17, 03:41 AM
Rockmeister Rockmeister is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,051
hyacinth rain by John Dutfield, on Flickr

This is the Nikkor 60 Micro. Tested (on DXoMark etc) it rates the worst of all the lenses suggested to you above. Go to Flikr and enlarge that drop center right on the stem. Crap huh? Tripod, a little distance for D of F, crop. Just my 2p.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-05-17, 06:32 AM
Soloist Soloist is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 305
1st Pics

OK Job done. Went for the Sig 105

First pictures.....need to use a faster shutter for busy bees....

_DSC3119 by Phantom903, on Flickr

_DSC3111 by Phantom903, on Flickr

_DSC3116 by Phantom903, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-05-17, 02:44 AM
Wiicrackpot Wiicrackpot is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 185
@Colinb, those shots of the lizard are immense, bought a Tamron 180mm F3.5 for my ESO50d but never got anywhere near as good as yours,
care to share your set up?, what camera?, ring flash etc...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
pink fish media