pink fish media

Go Back   pink fish media > discussion > d.i.y.

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 21-05-06, 12:36 AM
teddy_pardo teddy_pardo is offline
Trade: Teddy Pardo
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,301
regulator booster

Here is a nice a simple mod that can be applied wherever a 317,337,1086 regulator is used.

The idea here is to insert a VBE before the 3-leg regulator. The VBE filters high frequencies noise (in fact almost all relevant frequencies) before they get to the regulator, and isolates the regulator from the power rail in a way that noise from one regulated circuit doesn't get back to the power rail (let's say less noise...). Doing that significantly boosts the performance of these simple regulators.

It looks like this (Carl, do you recognise your capacitors...):





Note that you have to cut the strip-board between the collector and the emitter of the transistor. Otherwise it will still work, but no benefit...



Isn't it lovely?

it's a pin-pin replacement with the original regulator, you can even reuse the original regulator. The original regulator circuit (resistors/capacitors) remains as is, no need to change anything. The VBE requires some dropout (about 1V), if you don't have it than simply replace the original 317 by a 1086 which is low dropout to compensate.

The circuit is based on the same VBE circuit used on the Flea (BC547c, 3.3uF film, 10K, and 10/22uF tant), but other combinations can be used. As is, it can only be used for low current circuits (few 10s of mA), for higher currents smaller resistors and larger capacitors at the transistor base should be used. I achieved excellent results with 22uF tantalums, and 10-56uF oscons.

I used this circuit to replace all the regulators in my CDX (there are about 20). I replaced each time 2-3 regulators, and each time the improvement was noticeable.

Highly recommended!

Ooops. I forgot to mention, a ground wire has to be connected from the circuit ground to the main PCB ground. I used a short wire connected to the ground leg of one of the main PCB tantalum (the Vout tantalum of the original regulator circuit).

Enjoy, Teddy
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-05-06, 05:37 AM
martin clark martin clark is offline
pinko bodger
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,367
Very tidy! I'd agree the improvment can be worth the effort, too.

Just one little note - the transistor (if it's still BC547) has a collector current limit of 100mA, so if you plan one of these for a rail drawing significantly more than say 70-80mA it would be a good idea to swap to some other transistor with higher current handling. Something like BD139 would be ideal - or BD140 (PNP) for negative regs. - though the lower Hfe will slightly increase voltage drop across the gyrator. A simple rule of thumb would be this: if the existing reg has a heatsink, use a small power transistor instead.

The current limit of the BC547 (and the extra volt or two drop with small-power alternatives) is unlikely to be a problem on most analogue rails in, say, preamps and cd players though.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-05-06, 09:13 AM
teddy_pardo teddy_pardo is offline
Trade: Teddy Pardo
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,301
Yes indeed, for higher currents I've used BC639/BC640. But since their hfe is too low I added a bc547 to build a darlington configuration (requires one more row on the strip-board). BC639 and BC640 can hold few hundreds of mA.

On the CDX 15V rail there is a regulator that caries 1A (the one with the heatsink), for this one I used a power darlington.

I would add to your rule of thumb, to measure the dropout on the transistor, if it's more than 1V then the resistor value needs to be reduced and the capacitor augmented accordingly. If that doesn't help or the transistor gets hot then it has to be replaced by something with more power handling capacity.

Teddy
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-06-06, 05:30 AM
hacker hacker is offline
Delicious and nutritious
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,139
How much current can a 321 circuit draw when running flat-out? I'm thinking of trying this mod inside my pregregulating psu, but don't know if it's going to perform when playing music very, very loud... in essence, I want to know the vbe will work under the maximum current that a 321 will draw.

The plan is to replace the 4 LM1086s in the psu with Teddy's new circuit.

Cheers,
Carl
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-06-06, 05:36 AM
martin clark martin clark is offline
pinko bodger
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,367
The line stages are class-A, and so run at very nearly constant current (c. 40mA off teh top of my head). No problem with the VBE trick.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-06-06, 05:41 AM
hacker hacker is offline
Delicious and nutritious
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,139
Excellent. I take it the buffers use even less power. Even when I add in the miniscule current from the LED and relay, I'll still be withing tolerance. Cheers Martin.

Carl
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-06-06, 11:53 AM
PigletsDad PigletsDad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,444
An idea which may not fly.

The noise floor of a VBE is quite a bit lower than even the best 317/337 etc, although the output impedance is rather worse.

There may be some applications where it is worth putting a VBE after the regulator - for cases where noise level is overriding. One possibility would be an MC phono stage.

This will give some of the noise benefits of a SR from a simple circuit, without the very low output impedance.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-06-06, 12:10 PM
teddy_pardo teddy_pardo is offline
Trade: Teddy Pardo
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,301
Yes, I agree, and indeed I'm using VBEs in places where I don't care about output impedence. That's what I did when I used a VBE for each resistor on my 102 and results where very good.

Teddy
__________________
www.teddypardo.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-06-06, 01:26 PM
martin clark martin clark is offline
pinko bodger
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,367
Quote:
although the output impedance is rather worse
Good point - just a point of reference for those try ing it, output Z for a transistor operated this way is approx. [26/(collector current in mA)]. So, draw 26mA gives an o/put Z of 1ohm. Pretty grim compared with any 3-pin reg...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-07-09, 05:54 PM
mikesnowdon mikesnowdon is offline
resU deretsigeR
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,687
Hi Teddy.

I need your help with something please. In this thread I am looking at how to implement your reg booster to a negative regulator. Ive used google and the forum search facility and tried to understand as much as I can from this thread. Im stuck though. Can you help?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 13-12-09, 07:58 PM
mikesnowdon mikesnowdon is offline
resU deretsigeR
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,687
Planning to do this to the 7805 regs on the DAC's in my CA 640 V2. Can I sub the 3.3uF for ayting else as Im on a tight budget? Maybe a 2uf Film would be cheaper, of a Tant with a film bypass?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 14-12-09, 03:02 AM
hacker hacker is offline
Delicious and nutritious
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,139
Tants should be fine, and bigger is better within sensible limits. 10uF, 22uF, 33uF - all are fine. As long as the voltage rating is sufficient you should have no worries.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 14-12-09, 07:08 AM
mikesnowdon mikesnowdon is offline
resU deretsigeR
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,687
Cheers Hacker. Am I OK using the same value for both caps in the VBE or is there an ideal value for this implementation? I'm planning on using them on the +VDD and +VAA (Digital and analogue suplies) on he DAC IC's. Later the DAC's will be given their own dedicated supply from one of you first PSU boards.

I got one of those 'lucky bags' of caps from Maplin and it came with a bunch of 3.3uF/25 Oscons. Could these be usefull? (bag also came with some Panny FC's and Elna Stargates )
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 14-12-09, 07:24 AM
martin clark martin clark is offline
pinko bodger
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,367
Use whatever caps you like. Same value will be fine.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 14-12-09, 10:08 AM
mikesnowdon mikesnowdon is offline
resU deretsigeR
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,687
Are you sure I can use any old cap? Isn't there an ideal type for this application, like low ESR to reduce the overall impedance of the circuit?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
pink fish media