pink fish media

Go Back   pink fish media > discussion > d.i.y.

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 16-12-06, 02:28 AM
teddy_pardo teddy_pardo is offline
Trade: Teddy Pardo
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,448
howto: replacing the ALWSR pre-regulator by a VBE

I was asked by many to summarize the long ďreplacing the ALWSR pre-regulatorĒ thread, and provide a short howto for people who just want to make it without reading the whole thread.

A quick background
The ALWSR has a pre-regulator, which is based on a monolithic linear regulator. Through experiments, I discovered that the performance of the ALWSR can be significantly improved by providing it a smoother input containing less high frequency noise. It was first done using an LC filter, and then using a VBE (Gyrator) circuit. Since both the super regulator and the pre regulator are linear regulators, the whole circuit is limited in itís abilities to deal with high frequencies as exists on the mains, and generated by the rectification process. A VBE circuit consists of a low pass filter, feeding the base of a transistor configured as emitter follower. The role of the transistor is to provide current with lower impedance. This howto explains how to replace the pre regulator by a VBE.

The VBE
It turns out that the filter and the transistor have significant effect on the performance. The best circuit so far consists of a second order filter (RCRC), and a FET transistor or a Darlington made of discrete components (more on that later).

The circuit is described here (many thanks to Hacker for the drawing)



The Filter
Best results were achieved using film capacitors. Electrolytic capacitors should be avoided here. For C2 Iím using 6-10uF polyester (MMK, MKS etc), and for C1, the second filter, Iím usually using a 220nF polypropylene. Class X2 capacitors (AKA suppression or AC capacitors) are doing a great job here.

R1 and R4 effect the dropout, Iím usually using 64K/1.5M for low dropout, or 100K/1M when I can afford a higher dropout.

The transistor
Two main options exist, FET or Darlington. FET has a larger dropout and higher output impedance, most people on the forum preferred FET as it is giving a better bass. Personally I found that I like both, and it depends on the application. I also discovered that high impedance at the output of the VBE adds bass, and that may be the cause of the difference in sound. This bass is IMO slightly artificial but nonetheless pleasant to the ear. You can make a simple experiment by using just the VBE circuit without the super-regulator (the SR reduces the output impedance of the VBE). Youíll get a sound which is rich in bass, and very pleasant, something like a tube amplifier.

With a FET, R3 is mandatory to avoid oscillations. I found that even with a Darlington it provides a slight improvement. Note that in order to use this resistor youíll have to make a cut on the PCB (see picture below). Smaller values can be used too, I've used 118R successfully.

In order to make a Darlington I use bc547c and D44H11, together they provide a HFE of about 100,000, allowing relatively low output impedance (few ohms). If your system has sufficient bass I'd personally recommend Darlington (but most other people prefere FET, so make your choice...). Here is how I build a Darlington transistor from discrete components:



Here are some pictures of the modified ALWSR board:







This one is made of seven 1uF MKS capacitors:



Note the cut on the PCB below the blue 64K resistor. This cut is made to allow using R3 to avoid oscillations.

__________________
www.teddypardo.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-12-06, 06:13 AM
hacker hacker is offline
Delicious and nutritious
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,340
Great stuff here, Teddy.

Something to bear in mind for the budding DIY-er who hasn't yet done this mod is that the pins on the ALWSR are used differently with this mod. I've pinched the following from the original thread:

1. Link TRS2 to TRGND
2. Link TRIN to SRIN
3. Use TROUT as the Input (instead of TRIN)

Failure to do this will result in a less than satisfying sound

Cheers,
Carl
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-12-06, 10:24 AM
natzev_i natzev_i is offline
pfm Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 343
So, isnít it just time somebody (Andy?, Teddy?) to produce a new PCB or assembled unit called ALW-TP Super-Mega Regulator combining the VBE and the W. Jung final regulator?
Just a thought.
Ivo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-12-06, 07:20 AM
maxlorenz maxlorenz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 55
Thanks Teddy for your valuable effort :-)

I ordered parts for the simpler Darlington BDX33C based VBE, just to have a taste of it (out of stock at Farnell, it seems). I will use it on +5V, digital supplies and +/-15V analog supplies. Maybe use at lower V reduces differences between BDX33C and Fet based regs?

Where can I find the instructions to do the negative VBE-ALWSR?? BDX34C
I suppose...

Many thanks,
M
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-12-06, 10:55 AM
teddy_pardo teddy_pardo is offline
Trade: Teddy Pardo
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,448
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxlorenz View Post
Where can I find the instructions to do the negative VBE-ALWSR?? BDX34C
I suppose...
I'll try to post these too when I find a moment. It's a bit tricky though, you have to cross two of the transistor legs
__________________
www.teddypardo.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-12-06, 10:58 AM
teddy_pardo teddy_pardo is offline
Trade: Teddy Pardo
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,448
Quote:
Originally Posted by natzev_i View Post
So, isnít it just time somebody (Andy?, Teddy?) to produce a new PCB or assembled unit called ALW-TP Super-Mega Regulator combining the VBE and the W. Jung final regulator?
Just a thought.
Ivo
I don't have PCB design skills or tools, but I would be very happy if Andy will take the initiative...
__________________
www.teddypardo.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-02-07, 03:45 PM
maxlorenz maxlorenz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 55
Hi Teddy,

I finally added the VBE yesterday. The ALWSR is feeding the 5V digital PS of a CDPRO-2M transport. I decided on BDX33C because it is easier for my limited skills. Cap is a Wima MKS4 6.8uF and R is a 18K PRP resistor.
The cap is so long that I soldered it directly on TRGND, saving a few solder points ;-)
I must have done it right because improvements were heard just minutes after power on: Sound is cleaner; HF and specially lower high freqs. are sweeter and warmer; intruments' textures and timbres are better reproduced and individual instruments are hence more defined; bass was already good but also improved in weight and "expansiveness". Speed did not suffer.
All this only with a short listening session. I hope it improves further.

The effect led me exited... I have a few questions:

*are my R and C values OK?
*could you post or help with a schematic to replace 337 prereg with a BDX34C for the negative ALW?
(I fear a mistake from my part; I've been lucky so far)
*Can this VBE be used on other PS like DVD's SMPS.
I have a cheap modded multiformat player on my system nļ2 wich sounds good but still has HF noise :-(

Judging for my short experience I would say that the mod sounds like if I was using a BIG Wima MKS cap, he, he...I will shearch for Epcos MKP or MKS caps. Maybe they are cheaper.
The only "adverse effect" that I noticed might be a little less "air", but this may be just my ears used to HF noise or lack of burn-in...

Many thanks to Teddy, Andy and all who contributed to this wonderfull reg.

M.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-02-07, 07:29 AM
mjrod99@comcast mjrod99@comcast is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 92
I'm just getting into the mix.I want to use the modified ALW for 5 vdc and +/- 7 vdc for a cd player.What is the lowest voltage needed to get this mod to work properly?I'm presently using 2 batteries at +/-12 ps to the 2) ALW sr.I'm ready to get started.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-02-07, 07:33 AM
martin clark martin clark is offline
pinko bodger
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,153
5-6v overhead should be enough - if those are lead-acid batteries, they will range from c 13.8v fully charged down to 12ish discharged. The operative note of Teddy's is
Quote:
R1 and R4 effect the dropout, I’m usually using 64K/1.5M for low dropout, or 100K/1M when I can afford a higher dropout.
- so if you get more than 2.5v dropout across the capacitance multiplier, reduce R1 & R4. The ALWSR itself needs 2.5v of 'headroom'.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-02-07, 08:12 PM
mjrod99@comcast mjrod99@comcast is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 92
I'm also ready to do the negative version with the BDX34C negative version and don't want to screw it up.Also-what is the complementary negative version for IRF610?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 22-02-07, 01:29 AM
PigletsDad PigletsDad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,250
IRF9610 is a reasonable choice - pretty much any medium power P channel FET will do; it needs to handle enough current (at least 1A for safety), enough power (a few Watts) and enough voltage (at least 25V), but not be any bigger than needed, as this increases the interelectrode capacitance.

IRF9610 is 200V, 1.8A, 20W, so fits the bill nicely.

I think it is now being withdrawn, so may not be that easy to buy. If you have trouble, I will try to think of a more modern alternative.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 24-02-07, 12:19 AM
teddy_pardo teddy_pardo is offline
Trade: Teddy Pardo
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,448
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxlorenz View Post
Hi Teddy,

I finally added the VBE yesterday. The ALWSR is feeding the 5V digital PS of a CDPRO-2M transport. I decided on BDX33C because it is easier for my limited skills. Cap is a Wima MKS4 6.8uF and R is a 18K PRP resistor.
A BDX33C + MKS6.8 + 18K combination is a less than optimal combination. The BDX has a low hfe when used at low currents. If you want to use it you should rather use a smaller resistance of up to 10K and a larger capacitor
__________________
www.teddypardo.com
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 24-02-07, 12:25 AM
teddy_pardo teddy_pardo is offline
Trade: Teddy Pardo
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,448
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxlorenz View Post
Where can I find the instructions to do the negative VBE-ALWSR??
Here:




__________________
www.teddypardo.com
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 24-02-07, 03:58 AM
maxlorenz maxlorenz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 55
Many thanks for your reply, Teddy.

A pitty that my mod is less than ideal. Anyway it sounds better than before. Bass is deeep.
Will 6.8uF*2 //, plus 10K be enough?
(RS-online carry big MMK caps, up to 33uF)

Excuses for the basic questions
*Wich is better for low V circuits, Mosfet or home-made Darlington?

*My raw supply is rather high, will a pre-reg placed before VBE be detrimental to sound?

*Can I use VBE before monolitic regs, like LM317, or in SMPS (if I find the schematics) and still enjoy the sound improvements? I guess yes...


I will try to digest your mod to (-)SR

Best regards,
M
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 24-02-07, 09:45 AM
teddy_pardo teddy_pardo is offline
Trade: Teddy Pardo
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,448
*Wich is better for low V circuits, Mosfet or home-made Darlington?

For high currents, I'd use home-made Darlingtons as they have lower impedance

*My raw supply is rather high, will a pre-reg placed before VBE be detrimental to sound?

No, I did it in a similar situation and it works perfectly good

*Can I use VBE before monolitic regs, like LM317, or in SMPS (if I find the schematics) and still enjoy the sound improvements? I guess yes...

Yes
__________________
www.teddypardo.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© pink fish media