1. Things you need to know about the new ‘Conversations’ PM system:

    a) DO NOT REPLY TO THE NOTIFICATION EMAIL! I get them, not the intended recipient. I get a lot of them and I do not want them! It is just a notification, log into the site and reply from there.

    b) To delete old conversations use the ‘Leave conversation’ option. This is just delete by another name.
    Dismiss Notice

Nacs: 202 v 82

Discussion in 'audio' started by Mike g, Nov 23, 2010.

  1. Mike g

    Mike g pfm Member

    My current amplification is nac 202, teddycap plus and an avondale version of a nap 250. I have been having an itch about the older naim gear. I would love a 282 but this is out of my reach. However a change from the 202 to an 82 would be reasonably cost neutral. So my question: how would these compare? Is the newer 202 similar to the older 82 or is there a jump in performance with the 82? I understand that the older 82 will have more prat and this very much appeals.

    Cheers

    Mike
     
  2. rough edges

    rough edges pfm Member

    An 82 really benefits from a Supercap or 2XHicap arrangement. I think if you're going to use the teddycap, as good as it is, you will not really be getting the full advantage of going to the 82. I ran an 82 with 1 Hicap, 2XHicap, and Supercap into a 250. Anyway, the real deal is the 52. Save for that...

    Best,
    BBM
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice