1. Things you need to know about the new ‘Conversations’ PM system:

    a) DO NOT REPLY TO THE NOTIFICATION EMAIL! I get them, not the intended recipient. I get a lot of them and I do not want them! It is just a notification, log into the site and reply from there.

    b) To delete old conversations use the ‘Leave conversation’ option. This is just delete by another name.
    Dismiss Notice

Trump Part 18

Discussion in 'off topic' started by kendo, Oct 10, 2019.

  1. wacko

    wacko pfm Member

    Corrupt sh1ts gotta help each other stay in power. By hook or by crook.
     
    ariegur likes this.
  2. tones

    tones Tones deaf

  3. SteveS1

    SteveS1 I heard that, pardon?

    Pressure to get Bolton on the stand is becoming harder to resist.
     
  4. Stunsworth

    Stunsworth pfm Member

    Trump seems to be saying that Bolton's book is all untrue, _and_ that it contains classified information. Hmmm.

    When Trump says how terrible these former officials were, I wonder if he reflects on what that says about the person who appointed them (rhetorical question)?
     
  5. Del monaco

    Del monaco pfm Member

    The vote may be close enough to damage him. It may be seen as an opportunity for both sides of the house.
     
  6. Yank

    Yank Bulbous Also Tapered

    Not to mention Orban and Duda...
     
  7. tones

    tones Tones deaf

    I'm not altogether sure that reflection (apart from the one in the mirror to arrange carefully the combover) plays any part in what passes for Donald's thinking - it's all shoot from the lip. Some folk have referred to him as the toddler-in-chief.
     
  8. matthewr

    matthewr spɹɐʍʞɔɐq spɹoɔǝɹ ɹnoʎ sʎɐld

    One might recall that Mr Trump repeatedly promised "only the best people".
     
  9. tones

    tones Tones deaf

    Perhaps he inadvertently omitted the "a" in "beast".
     
  10. vuk

    vuk \o/ choose anarchy

    @tones
    @matthewr

    remember back at the start of the presidency when the republicans hated trump and nobody wanted to work with him? i had the crazy idea that perhaps pelosi could strike some kind of deal and get some dems in there, maybe to work on infrastructure. i guess it seems silly or absurd now, but did he really have any sort of plans back then?
     
  11. matthewr

    matthewr spɹɐʍʞɔɐq spɹoɔǝɹ ɹnoʎ sʎɐld

    The Republicans only hated Trump up to the point he was elected, but after that they switched pretty quick. Also remember the House and Senate were both GOP controlled before the midterms so no end-around was possible even if they wanted to.
     
  12. Roger Adams

    Roger Adams Well-Known Member

    Please don't let Zoe Lofgren answer any more questions! She is a walking disaster for the prosecution.

    I was under the misguided impression that a Q&A session would allow both parties to address the same question. Stupid suggestion. The whole process is flawed. If the framers meant for this to happen, then they were thick as pid ****.
     
  13. Craig B

    Craig B Re:trophile

    Old construction adage: Never let the framers do the finishing work.
     
    sean99 likes this.
  14. Joe P

    Joe P certified Buffologist / mod

    Jared Kushner tries to sell his Middle East Peace Plan on Fox & Friends: "Past proposals have been 2 to 3 pages — this is an over 80-page proposal with a map. Never been done before."

    Wow, more than 80 pages *and* a map. Last time I heard something like that the person talking was a student in front of a teacher.

    Joe
     
    vuk likes this.
  15. Roger Adams

    Roger Adams Well-Known Member

    It IS a bizarre experience watching this. The Trump mafioso defence team are arguing against impeachment on precedent. No one expects Trump to be removed from office but he has already in an impeachment hearing.

    The prosecution are arguing for the admission of witnesses who can shed more light on proceedings and any misdemeanors that may or may not have taken place.

    Is the latter not reasonable in a fair process of law?
     
  16. TheDecameron

    TheDecameron Unicorns fart glitter.

    Did Barron do the colouring in?
     
  17. Joe P

    Joe P certified Buffologist / mod

    Dec,

    Maybe, but at least Barron doesn’t think he’s an adult.

    Joe
     
  18. Yank

    Yank Bulbous Also Tapered

    Dershowitz defending Trump's whole "l'etat c'est moi" narcissist world view is remarkably insane.

    Trump's political survival is in the national interest, my ass.
     
    Sue Pertwee-Tyr likes this.
  19. Roger Adams

    Roger Adams Well-Known Member

    The suggestions maintaining the POTUS's unlimited power and that asking foreign powers to meddle in internal politics is fine smacks of dictatorial/magisterial omnipotence and would set a very dangerous precedent indeed.
     
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2020
    Sue Pertwee-Tyr likes this.
  20. mykel

    mykel Fat guy flying.

    Why are the lawyers being recounted, and why is this considered generous?























    I do believe you were looking for the word - remuneration.


    :eek::D:cool:
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice