1. Things you need to know about the new ‘Conversations’ PM system:

    a) DO NOT REPLY TO THE NOTIFICATION EMAIL! I get them, not the intended recipient. I get a lot of them and I do not want them! It is just a notification, log into the site and reply from there.

    b) To delete old conversations use the ‘Leave conversation’ option. This is just delete by another name.
    Dismiss Notice

UK Election 2015 (part II)

Discussion in 'off topic' started by cooky1257, Apr 22, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. cooky1257

    cooky1257 pfm Member

    Sadly the Torys(and their supporters) seem to think 20/20 hindsight empowered them with 20/20 foresight-it didn't/doesn't, they wanted less regulation and signed off every single Labour Budget. But then they are peerless when it comes to lies.
     
  2. Brian

    Brian Eating fat, staying slim

    The tory fantasy again that Brown caused the global economic problems. :D
    I think you'll find banks were the main problem.
     
  3. Brian

    Brian Eating fat, staying slim

    Very true.
     
  4. matthewr

    matthewr spɹɐʍʞɔɐq spɹoɔǝɹ ɹnoʎ sʎɐld

    Once again the sequence of events as they actually happened:

    1) Osborne launches Plan A, Austerity.

    2) Plan A is not working and has snuffed out the nascent recovery engendered by Labour with their Plan B ("A is Too far too fast").

    3) Plan A is abandoned in favour of Plan B ("A is Too Far too fast") rhetoric continues with Plan A for political reasons.

    4) "Plan A worked we need MOAR PLAN A".

    So pragmatism didn't override ideology, he made a terrible, costly mistake that has damaged our economy far worse than anything Gordon Brown did and then adopted the policies of the people he now brands as economically incompetent.
     
  5. Colin L

    Colin L pfm Member

    I've posted this before, but I'll do it again for the benefit of the deluded out there who believe the Tories and tory media and swallow the myth that only the Tories can be trusted with the economy.


    [​IMG]

    For the last 65 years, whether Tory or Labour government GDP / head has followed a trend-line..other underlying data backs this up. Unless the government does somethng insanely stupid the economy grows fairly consistently irrespective of the colour of the government. However, this ConDem coalition did something stupid, Austerity. Growth, productivity have cratered. The economy is now slowly struggling back to some growth DESPITE austerity and the Tory policies, NOT because of them.

    The way to reduce the budget deficit is to grow the economy, generate tax revenue and thereby reduce benefit claims. One of the issues we have is that the tax base has been eroded by companies offshoring their profits and the 1% hiding their income and wealth in tax-dodges. The last figure I saw was that this costs the exchequer about £20-30bn pa, but the Tories will never do anything about this.
     
  6. Mullardman

    Mullardman Moderately extreme...

    Excellent.

    Or to precis it.

    Tory economic policy and rhetoric is a rather thin smokescreen to hide theft.
     
  7. Steven Toy

    Steven Toy L3 Toy

    Was the budget deficit between 2001 and 2007 justifiable?
     
  8. auric

    auric pfm Member

    What should we have done without to ensure no budget deficit between 2001 and 2007?
    And would 2001 - 2007 been acceptable to the country as a whole?
     
  9. Joe Hutch

    Joe Hutch Mate of the bloke

    Invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq?
     
  10. auric

    auric pfm Member

    Do they count for the whole deficit, if not then what else should have gone to ensure no deficit?
     
  11. Steven Toy

    Steven Toy L3 Toy

    There was a lot of expenditure with precious little to show for it. It is too easy to squander other people's money on increasing the scope and power of government for its own sake. I remember one catastrophic, wasteful, eye-wateringly expensive and utterly pointless IT project in particular.

    We could have done without nothing.
     
  12. Joe Hutch

    Joe Hutch Mate of the bloke

    I don't have the actual numbers at my fingertips, but every little helps.
     
  13. auric

    auric pfm Member

  14. Paul R

    Paul R pfm Member

    What?

    And, FWIW, quantity of regulation is irrelevant.

    That's a very unselfaware comment coming in the same paragraph that contains a completely unnecessary untruth.

    We'll leave the inappropriate apostrophe on the table for now.

    Paul
     
  15. Paul R

    Paul R pfm Member

    You seem to be making very basic statistical errors.

    FWIW what actually is 'GDP per head, logged'?

    Your chart shows a historically catastrophic drop in 'GDP per head, logged' during the financial crisis, so nothing to with the coalition or 'austerity'. It then shows a resumption of growth trend indistinguishable from the historic line you've drawn. It's pretty clear that the trend line doesn't include recent history, why not redraw it to show all available data, and the trend overall?

    FWIW I'm always very suspicious of people who fit lines to data and use them to project the future without an underlying physical model to justify the use of a line. And who don't explain what the data they are graphing is, or where it is sourced.

    Paul
     
  16. matthewr

    matthewr spɹɐʍʞɔɐq spɹoɔǝɹ ɹnoʎ sʎɐld

    Because the recovery under Labour followed the path predicted by models based on past recessions and how the economy recovers from deep financial shocks. There are lots of models and theories about how all this works from Keynes, to Hicks, to Samuelson, to Friedman, to Neo-Liberalism, to New Keynesianism.

    There are no models for Austerity; a policy which caused the path of recovery to deviate from the expectation when applied, and revert to the predicted path when removed.
     
  17. Paul R

    Paul R pfm Member

    The post collapse trend looks pretty similar to that in 2001-2007. You could infer from that chart that stimulation leads to reduced rates of growth, given the change between 1995-2001 and subsequent and that Brown started serious spending in 2001 and continued right up until there was no money left. Subsequently minimum austerity spending is still constrained by that prior history of unfunded spending.

    And it's not like we ever actually had 'austerity'.

    I'm still unclear what 'GDP per head, logged' means. If 'logged' means 'logarithm of' then that's both appalling English and appears to assume the potential for exponentials. Which are unlikely in reality. So maybe that's not what it means.

    Paul
     
  18. Greg

    Greg 2t5b

    Where has it worked?

    2010 - 2012 = cuts = unmitigated disaster
    2012 - 2015 = spends = growing economy (i.e. shrugging off the cape of ideology in practice, whilst still pretending to wear the cape of ideology in statements)

    The most remarkable part of the Tory tenure has been to frame Labour with 'austerity' and Labour has followed suit, foolishly.
     
  19. Mick P

    Mick P Retired and content

    Greg

    It is foolish comments such as "unmitigated disaster" that makes me despair.

    It is impossible to discuss anything with someone who bandies expressions like that around.

    The FSTE 1000 has grown by approx 20% under Gideon which beats inflation.

    We are creating more jobs etc than anyone else in Europe and according to Newsnight, last night, nearly 80% of those jobs are full time. The economy is expanding faster than most EU countries so the only people doing the moaning are the usual professional moaners.

    We need more of the medicine, not less and that is why Labour and the Libs will continue with it. The electorate will decide what it wants and what you and I think on a hifi forum is of no importance at all, hence my much reduced input into these pointless discussions and before you ask, Yes I will pull out of this and I already regret my input into it as I am not going to convert you to my way of thinking and vice versa. We are both wasting our time.

    Mick
     
  20. Joe Hutch

    Joe Hutch Mate of the bloke

    Charles Dickens comments: 'I do not remember having ever fainted away, or having even been moved to tears of joyful pride, at sight of any legislative body. I have borne the House of Commons like a man, and have yielded to no weakness, but slumber, in the House of Lords. I have seen elections for borough and county, and have never been impelled (no matter which party won) to damage my hat by throwing it in the air in triumph, or to crack my voice by shouting forth any reference to our Glorious Constitution, to the noble purity of our independent voters, or the unimpeachable integrity of our independent members' ("American Notes", 1842)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice